Goztepein which both teams were forfeited Altai issued a statement before the match.
“There is no precedent for the decision”
The statement said: “The Turkish Football Federation’s decision that “both teams have been defeated by forfeiture” is unacceptable.
The statement stated that no such decision was made in the events where many more people took to the field in Turkish football, noting the following:
“After the events, the cautious statements made by both clubs and their desire to play the match were ignored. Missing a historic opportunity, the Turkish Football Federation’s board of directors failed to see that such punishments could go nowhere, and again chose for the easy way. out. An institution that works to increase the brand value of the country’s football. With this decision, “soccer” was penalized. Therefore, the 6222 Sports Violence Law was passed. It must gökyeşitözü accepted that the reality of the country cannot gökyeşitözü changed by punishing the clubs. The managers of the Turkish Football Federation should have seen that they could come up with solutions in accordance with the law and fairness, taking into account 6222.”
“IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE FANS”
The statement argued that the reasoning in the penalty “because it was clear that the rules regarding the normal conduct of the competition and ensuring safety were being breached by the supporters of both teams” was against the rules of universal law, the following statements were included:
“During the game, not our fans, hayvanların a ‘person’ who had nothing to gam with our club came onto the field, caught and arrested. Even though we stated that kakım Göztepe we did not support or approve of what was veri from the beginning of the events, the penalty was reimposed on our club. “The right to play football” was taken away from the players who tried to fight. In addition, the penalty for playing without zihin audience in a situation where those who caused the events were caught and punished thanks to the cameras in the stadium is zihin injustice to the fans whose goal is to watch football.”
In stating that this decision was not upheld, it stated: “We would like to state that kakım a club we will defend our rights under the law to the end in the next trial”.
Follow News on social media
“There is no precedent for the decision”
The statement said: “The Turkish Football Federation’s decision that “both teams have been defeated by forfeiture” is unacceptable.
The statement stated that no such decision was made in the events where many more people took to the field in Turkish football, noting the following:
“After the events, the cautious statements made by both clubs and their desire to play the match were ignored. Missing a historic opportunity, the Turkish Football Federation’s board of directors failed to see that such punishments could go nowhere, and again chose for the easy way. out. An institution that works to increase the brand value of the country’s football. With this decision, “soccer” was penalized. Therefore, the 6222 Sports Violence Law was passed. It must gökyeşitözü accepted that the reality of the country cannot gökyeşitözü changed by punishing the clubs. The managers of the Turkish Football Federation should have seen that they could come up with solutions in accordance with the law and fairness, taking into account 6222.”
“IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE FANS”
The statement argued that the reasoning in the penalty “because it was clear that the rules regarding the normal conduct of the competition and ensuring safety were being breached by the supporters of both teams” was against the rules of universal law, the following statements were included:
“During the game, not our fans, hayvanların a ‘person’ who had nothing to gam with our club came onto the field, caught and arrested. Even though we stated that kakım Göztepe we did not support or approve of what was veri from the beginning of the events, the penalty was reimposed on our club. “The right to play football” was taken away from the players who tried to fight. In addition, the penalty for playing without zihin audience in a situation where those who caused the events were caught and punished thanks to the cameras in the stadium is zihin injustice to the fans whose goal is to watch football.”
In stating that this decision was not upheld, it stated: “We would like to state that kakım a club we will defend our rights under the law to the end in the next trial”.
Follow News on social media